• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

2023 MLB Rule Changes

olbriar

 
Moderator
Jun 19, 2010
35,544
1
60,789
Land of Oz
Here are the details of the three rule changes coming to MLB next season:

PITCH TIMER

In an effort to create a quicker pace of play, there will be a 30-second timer between batters. Between pitches, there will be a 15-second timer with the bases empty and a 20-second timer with runners on base. At last check, the pitch timer had reduced the average time of game in MiLB by about 26 minutes. This rule, which includes limits on throws to first base, has also increased stolen-base attempts. With this rule in place in the Minors this season, steal attempts per game have increased from 2.23 in 2019, at a 68% success rate, to 2.83 in 2022, at a 77% success rate.

  • The pitcher must begin his motion to deliver the pitch before the expiration of the pitch timer.
  • Pitchers who violate the timer are charged with an automatic ball. Batters who violate the timer are charged with an automatic strike.
  • Batters must be in the box and alert to the pitcher by the 8-second mark or else be charged with an automatic strike.
  • With runners on base, the timer resets if the pitcher attempts a pickoff or steps off the rubber.
  • Pitchers are limited to two disengagements (pickoff attempts or step-offs) per plate appearance. However, this limit is reset if a runner or runners advance during the plate appearance.
  • If a third pickoff attempt is made, the runner automatically advances one base if the pickoff attempt is not successful.
  • Mound visits, injury timeouts and offensive team timeouts do not count as a disengagement.
  • If a team has used up all five of its allotted mound visits prior to the ninth inning, that team will receive an additional mound visit in the ninth inning. This effectively serves as an additional disengagement.
  • Umpires may provide extra time if warranted by special circumstances. (So if, as an example, a catcher were to be thrown out on the bases to end the previous half-inning and needed additional time to put on his catching gear, the umpire could allow it.)
DEFENSIVE SHIFT LIMITS

The defensive team must have a minimum of four players on the infield, with at least two infielders completely on either side of second base. These restrictions are intended to increase the batting average on balls in play, to allow infielders to better showcase their athleticism and to restore more traditional outcomes on batted balls. As of this writing, the league-wide batting average on balls in play of .291 in 2022 is six points lower than in 2012 and 10 points lower than in 2006.

  • The four infielders must be within the outer boundary of the infield when the pitcher is on the rubber.
  • Infielders may not switch sides. In other words, a team cannot reposition its best defender on the side of the infield the batter is more likely to hit the ball.
  • If the infielders are not aligned properly at the time of the pitch, the offense can choose an automatic ball or the result of the play.
  • This rule does not preclude a team from positioning an outfielder in the infield or in the shallow outfield grass in certain situations. But it does prohibit four-outfielder alignments.
BIGGER BASES

The bases, which traditionally have been 15 inches square, will instead be 18 inches square. Home plate is unchanged.

Though this can have a modest impact on stolen-base success rate, the primary goal of this change is to give players more room to operate and to avoid collisions. This is especially important at first base, where fielders have an extra 3-inch advantage to stay out of harm’s way from the baserunner while receiving throws.

This change will create a 4 1/2-inch reduction in the distance between first and second base and between second base and third, which encourages more stolen-base attempts. The bigger bases could also have the effect of reducing oversliding in which a player loses contact with the bag while sliding through it.
 
I like the idea of speeding up the game. It is slow enough moving without reviews and endless bullpen. Pitch timing will make a difference and I think it doesn't change the game beyond speeding it up a bit.

Defensive shifts have definitely limited the offense. There is something to be respected for a player than can move the ball around instead of being so predictable that his at bats are almost always an out. Not sure I'm liking this change. I understand it however. Fans get off on offense and need all they can get.

Bigger bases will change the game more than they anticipate. Certainly it reduces the space between them and will make it easier to keep contact with. It will make double plays a lot easier too... don't kid yourself. I think we'll see more double plays with bigger bases.
I don't understand the merit in making them larger unless it's to give a base runner a greater path or real-estate and keep the first baseman from getting his ankle stepped on.

What's your thoughts? Fan or not?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Unforgiven
Upvote 0
I am not liking the defensive position changes at all...
There is a strategy there that is being taken away that coaches have used depending on the batter.
How is that supposed to be better?

It's definitely become a big part of the game. Everyone with que cards in their pockets. :) If they want to increase hits in a game, take some inches off of the mound or move it back a bit. Either will increase offense without handcuffing the defense.
 
Upvote 0
Pitch timer: I'm all for. Been watching minors games for years with it and don't really notice it as part of the game. Plus, most of the stars playing now have played with the timer on their way up. I'm not sure about only allowing 2 throws / stepoffs, but I'll withhold judgement until I see it in action.

Eliminating shifts: I'm all for a traditional alignment. Baseball should be played by players, not computer models. There is a difference between playing a lefty to pull to right by cheating the 2nd basemen, center fielder, and right fielder over vs. having the left fielder the only person to the left of second base. And eliminate the cue cards. It is supposed to be a mental game (for the players) and be aware of the situation.

I think the bases are mostly about safety. Oddly enough, I didn't realize that for years second base was measured differently than first and third. I think they measured to the rear of first and third and the front of second, or something like that. Whatever, I think the limit to stepoffs / pickoff throws will have a greater impact on theft attempts than 3" shorter basepaths.

I will say I watch my son play a seven inning game that doesn't feel rushed in 1:45 minutes and it really makes 4 hour baseball games seem extreme.
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
I'm a Pirates fan. Worst owner(s) in the history of sports.
I can't say the worst owners, but I do have a soft spot for Pirates fans. You have all the ingredients for success (fans that want to support a team, stadium, farm system) but your ownership just doesn't take advantage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dannydet
Upvote 0
I can't say the worst owners, but I do have a soft spot for Pirates fans. You have all the ingredients for success (fans that want to support a team, stadium, farm system) but your ownership just doesn't take advantage.

I mean why even own a team if you are just going to trade everyone away at the trade deadline. There's no serious effort to field a functioning team that can compete. They had some good years in 2013-14 but they gave up too easily. Really a disgrace.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dannydet
Upvote 0
It sounds like you are talking about my Royals. They seem to be the stepping stone between farm system and MLB. We groom them up and give them some top level experience then sell them off. Let me tell you how I really feel. A Royal's flag flies underneath old glory every summer. I took it down today and tossed it in the trash.
 
Upvote 0
I mean why even own a team if you are just going to trade everyone away at the trade deadline. There's no serious effort to field a functioning team that can compete. They had some good years in 2013-14 but they gave up too easily. Really a disgrace.
It sounds like you are talking about my Royals. They seem to be the stepping stone between farm system and MLB. We groom them up and give them some top level experience then sell them off. Let me tell you how I really feel. A Royal's flag flies underneath old glory every summer. I took it down today and tossed it in the trash.
I think MLB needs real revenue sharing as the revenue has shifted from gate sales to TV rights, so the big markets (LA, Chicago, NY, Boston) have a massive advantage. I know they have always had a revenue edge because fans will pay more for a ticket and concessions, stadiums have higher attendance, local corporate sponsorship opportunities are better, etc. But when LA sold from the McCourts and then got dumb money for local TV rights it changed the game. Red Sox have had the advantage for years by owning NESN. Hell, they are charging $40 / month just to watch Red Sox games (which is why I don't watch any more). Most teams can carry multiple $300+ million dollar contracts and still surround those stars with enough talent so the team can compete. The league (and the players union) should really study how revenue sharing, combined with caps and floors, made everyone richer in the NFL. That said, Red Sox ownership will still let a stud like Jon Lester walk and sign a player of arguably equivalent talent that can't handle the Boston media for twice the money (see: Price, David).
 
  • Like
Reactions: olbriar
Upvote 0
I'm in favor of anything that will make the games a bit more competitive. I'm accustomed to losing so I'm not whining. I watch the Royals because they are my team. I will admit to only half watching their games that I mute and listen to streamed music and mess with this forum. The games are rarely close and just isn't a stand alone entertainment. I would not dream of paying money to watch them on TV or in their stadium.
 
Upvote 0
I'm in favor of anything that will make the games a bit more competitive. I'm accustomed to losing so I'm not whining. I watch the Royals because they are my team. I will admit to only half watching their games that I mute and listen to streamed music and mess with this forum. The games are rarely close and just isn't a stand alone entertainment. I would not dream of paying money to watch them on TV or in their stadium.

They had a great run in 2015. I was always a George Brett fan. Him and Mike Schmidt were the 2 best 3B guys and matched up in 1980
 
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones